![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0HpyNHgud6t6frszXKU-WAiypYS6Hi_MUZnvjI8SpHRdSGDLL1NHJCKxrm10QNegYphh1grvpRvNMKrj3mbdSJDZlMBKeHmIGtQ7l-PR4H1lDpr1SE8fJIU19MCiJX1DEbBnJYtYTI1O6/s200/acce+007.jpg)
This year one of the projects is to measure the stiffness of different fishing poles - we had to tie fishing into it.
Here you can see a small accelerometer soldered to a small PCB - we've used these in the past to record vibration and shock using a microcontroller. Today we used the Labjack to capture the accel data.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQChXWWosb6Iw2YY-8IxHsMz9gjbiCxq6UA8kANhngeFJrGY4aqx8__CVBznA9uHaFSCPs2sYDqyRE4omE7MLkF8mzNSR8g6szMrvUtP-1sFYbgOLmJnsbJkbcj1O0z8KbfbmY0HDkkKsO/s200/accel2.jpg)
The IC is an old ADXL105 accelerometer - good for up to +/- 5G's.
Our plan was to measure the vibration of each fishing pole at the tip and middle of the pole as we pulled the tip down and released it. A simple 'pluck' test to watch how fast the pole stops vibrating.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuuCV_EL5PRJdfxLN_Kby6j8fy5wBszFCiquH-kWt0N6xRxixs4f9wyyRlE-z6JiYezrjKmCjGDLGfjpqN3mz8yohWx216LcxTxhIsmZizMRnc1oZHkT3HyxhJSw9LW1zWKHuD1bYqiMvG/s200/vibf+001.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEja_M7Ba4BWJ-J3n67nNqiNvLoVr_aj2jvFuNQJFCVKpfUhn4zckkQArem_vvC0D2Kgokx6jhCuwTJE5RzNFcwB39fc8PbRvHrQYqK07gbYWT36d46G8rUFS3JDpqpzZQQM9BS_fVsqclYm/s200/vibf+011.jpg)
Our software is able to sample 2 channels at 600 samples per second. There is a danger of anti-aliasing because we aren't filtering out the higher frequencies... but since this is for a 5th grade class, we will just talk about sources of error...
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm-zx2XkGsQzkxaTItxvsf5NTsI821j-e6ZdmY5A7NsewWK0PSM5a_eDgElDm9yPMnuPmO4XRJbMbUgs2Bv9sk4sT2yYQdbv9yf67DYkEi4zJc2nJ9JfpozI1TDyrmVbD0DOfTTPt1BwDt/s200/vibf+017.jpg)
Both will add weight and skew the data - as will the wires, but again, we're after fun and not accuracy!
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzVZSClgiMMkSqvRzz4PIU_BL-eENPyvniTEcCGkLael2Ia55VjFDximq8_6m1uYT2BOrpfpwXXkko4ynqMCVHzcijf9lRgyZR_ikGWgK2eW7bf9nlybpgIiHunwgN6j-DPrS7P4rJLWSy/s200/vibf+019.jpg)
To run the test, we pulled down the tip of the rod one foot from its 'equilibrium' position, and let it go.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUOLFj3YPrZkq4RyzTy30OuJY3JAQ_G0XaL_FHh6-m3wDDPm6eKfreYVZUq8CLIaLftJ9dGQgiprVpcZvXKv1CKC15QDtHXUXxBhk7Z8PQ7lj4C4ectDePyCLhAPAeyQJRFQdVZHwVTB1D/s200/vibf+022.jpg)
That's called "peer reviewing"!
We collected some data and had fun. We'll collect more, and compare the 'action' of the different rods.
Hey - it quit raining outside... lets go fishing!